Upscaling e‑mental health in Europe : a six‑country qualitative analysis and policy recommendations from the eMEN project

E-mental health (eMH) encompasses the use of digital technologies to deliver, support, or enhance mental health services.
Despite the growing evidence for the effectiveness of eMH interventions, the process of implementation of eMH solutions in healthcare remains slow throughout Europe. To address this issue, the e-Mental Health Innovation and Transnational Implementation Platform North-West Europe (eMEN) project was initiated to increase the dissemination and quality of eMH services in Europe. In this project, status analyses regarding eMH in the six participating countries (i.e., Belgium, France, Germany, Ireland, The Netherlands, and the UK) were conducted and eight recommendations for eMH were developed.
Expert teams from the six participating countries conducted status analyses regarding the uptake of eMH based on a narrative literature review and stakeholder interviews. Based on these status analyses, the eMEN consortium developed eight policy recommendations to further support the implementation of eMH in Europe. The status analyses showed that the participating countries are in different stages of implementing eMH into mental healthcare. Some barriers to implementing eMH were common among countries (e.g., a limited legal and regulatory framework), while others were country-specific (e.g., fragmented, federal policies). The policy recommendations included fostering awareness, creating strong political commitment,
and setting reliable standards related to ethics and data security. The eMEN project has provided the initial recommendations to guide political and regulatory processes regarding eMH. Further research is needed to establish well-tailored implementation strategies and to assess the generalizability of the recommendations beyond the countries involved in the eMEN project.

Geachte bezoeker,

De informatie die u nu opvraagt, kan door psychotraumanet niet aan u worden getoond. Dit kan verschillende redenen hebben, waarvan (bescherming van het) auteursrecht de meeste voorkomende is. Wanneer het mogelijk is om u door te verwijzen naar de bron van deze informatie, dan ziet u hier onder een link naar die plek.

Als er geen link staat, kunt u contact opnemen met de bibliotheek, die u verder op weg kan helpen.

Met vriendelijke groet,
Het psychotraumanet-team.

Wolfgang Gaebel · R. Lukies · A. Kerst · J. Stricker · J. Zielasek · S. Diekmann · N. Trost · E. Gouzoulis‑Mayfrank · B. Bonroy · K. Cullen · K. Desie · A. P. Ewalds Mulliez · G. Gerlinger · K. Günther · H. J. Hiemstra · S. McDaid · C. Murphy · J. Sander · D. Sebbane · J. L. Roelandt · L. Thorpe · D. Topolska · E. Van Assche · T. Van Daele · L. Van den Broeck · C. Versluis · O. Vlijter | 2021
In: European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience ; ISSN: 1433-8491 | 271 | 1005-1016
Awareness, Belgians, Europeans, Health Care Policy, Mental health, Personal Interview, Research, Telemedicine
Affiliation author(s):