Cost-effectiveness of trauma CT in the trauma room versus the radiology department: the REACT trial

ObjectiveTo determine the cost-effectiveness of trauma room CT compared with CT performed at the radiology department.MethodsIn this randomised controlled trial, adult patients requiring evaluation in a level 1 trauma centre were included. In the intervention hospital the CT system was located within the trauma room and in the control hospital within the radiology department. Direct and indirect medical costs of the institutionalised stay and diagnostic and therapeutic procedures were calculated.ResultsA total of 1,124 patients were randomised with comparable demographic characteristics. Mean number of non-institutionalised days alive was 322.5 in the intervention group (95 % CI 314–331) and 320.7 in the control group (95 % CI 312.1–329.2). Mean costs of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures per hospital inpatient day were €554 for the intervention group and €468 for the control group. Total mean costs in the intervention group were €16,002 (95 % CI 13,075–18,929) and €16,635 (95 % CI 13,528–19,743) for the control group (P?=?0.77).ConclusionThe present study showed that in trauma patients the setting with a CT system located in the trauma room did not provide any advantages or disadvantages from a health economics perspective over a CT system located in the radiology department.

Geachte bezoeker,

De informatie die u nu opvraagt, kan door psychotraumanet niet aan u worden getoond. Dit kan verschillende redenen hebben, waarvan (bescherming van het) auteursrecht de meeste voorkomende is. Wanneer het mogelijk is om u door te verwijzen naar de bron van deze informatie, dan ziet u hier onder een link naar die plek.

Als er geen link staat, kunt u contact opnemen met de bibliotheek, die u verder op weg kan helpen.

Met vriendelijke groet,
Het psychotraumanet-team.


Reference: 
Saltzherr TP,Goslings JC,Bakker FC,Beenen LF,Olff M,Meijssen K,Asselman FF,Reitsma JB,Dijkgraaf MGW, | 2013
European Radiology | 23 | 1 | 148-155
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00330-012-2593-0
Affiliation author(s): 
ARQ National Psychotrauma Centre