Guidelines need a more evidence based approach: a commentary on the IASC Guidelines on Mental Health and Psychosocial Support in Emergency Settings
Mental health and psychosocial surveys in emergency settings provide essential information on the psychological and social consequences of armed conflict and natural disasters. They also have programmatic implications. The Inter-Agency Standing Committee (IASC) Guidelines on Mental Health and Psychosocial Support (MHPSS) in Emergency Settings fails to recognize the importance of data driven programmes. Outcome evaluations of mental health and psychosocial programs in emergency settings would provide crucial information for a best practices approach, which is currently lacking Evidence based information will be more likely to convince all humanitarian players to follow the recommendations in the MHPSS guidelines.
Geachte bezoeker,
De informatie die u nu opvraagt, kan door psychotraumanet niet aan u worden getoond. Dit kan verschillende redenen hebben,
waarvan (bescherming van het) auteursrecht de meeste voorkomende is. Wanneer het mogelijk is om u door te verwijzen naar de bron
van deze informatie, dan ziet u hier onder een link naar die plek.
Als er geen link staat, kunt u contact opnemen met de bibliotheek,
die u verder op weg kan helpen.
Met vriendelijke groet,
Het psychotraumanet-team.
Reference:
Barbara Lopes Cardozo | 2008
In: Intervention: the international journal of mental health, psychosocial work and counselling in areas of armed conflict, ISSN 1571-8883 | 6 | 3-4 | 252-254
http://www.interventionjournal.com/sites/default/files/6.3_10_Cardoso.pdf
In: Intervention: the international journal of mental health, psychosocial work and counselling in areas of armed conflict, ISSN 1571-8883 | 6 | 3-4 | 252-254
http://www.interventionjournal.com/sites/default/files/6.3_10_Cardoso.pdf